Showing posts with label Argentina. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Argentina. Show all posts

Saturday, 16 April 2011

Towards an eco-theology -- Latin American voices

Reprinted from World Council of Churches news, 30 Mar 2011. The author, Dr Marcelo Schneider, has been working as assistant to the WCC Central Committee moderator since 2006. He lives in Porto Alegre, Brazil and writes for several Latin American ecumenical and church-related news agencies.
***
The father of the Kyoto treaty, Argentina's ambassador Raul Estrada Oyuela (see his biog), spoke on the international diplomatic framework on climate change, in a seminar held 28 - 29 March at the Protestant theological school Instituto Universitario ISEDET in Buenos Aires.
 
 
The accepted axiom is, as the climate changes so the world, too, will change in dramatic and sometimes undesirable ways.

What does this often rapid change mean to Christians whose faith is intertwined with the glory and beauty of God’s creation, but challenged when that creation is corrupted and irreversibly altered?

Is the churches’ current theological reflection on stewardship and climate change ready for the rapid shifting of winds, weather, and life on earth as we know it and our grandparents knew it?

These questions were enough to prompt a variety of churches in Argentina to explore the "Christian faith and ecology: towards an eco-ecumenical theology",
The event was sponsored by ISEDET, the non-governmental Argentina-based Rural Reflection Group and the World Student Christian Federation (WSCF) Latin America and Caribbean region and was supported by the World Council of Churches (WCC) and the United Church of Canada.

An imperative concern for nature

"Climate changes occur very rapidly and have astonishing consequences,” said Dr Alfredo Salibian, an Argentinian biologist in an address to the group. “We are witnessing changes in our own lives, not only in relation to the context in which our parents or grandparents lived, but in relation to twenty, ten or five years ago."
Salibian proposed the addition of the prefix "eco" to theology, reflecting an imperative, urgent concern for nature. "We have to recall that the redemption offered by Jesus Christ is bidirectional,” he said. “On one side it is vertical because it allows for the restoration of relations of human beings with the Creator. But we tend to neglect the other part of this relationship, which is horizontal, which aims to heal the damaged relations between human beings and the rest of God's creation.” Therefore it is time to update Latin American theology, incorporating the prefix "eco" to redefine the meaning of "creation", "Christ", “human being” and "ecumenism" in light of stewardship for creation.
But it goes even further than that, says the father of the Kyoto Protocol, Raul Estrada Oyuela, who spoke on the international diplomatic framework linked to the theme of climate change at the event.

Theology and politics

Oyuela warned that the lack of mutual understanding between theology and politics could be damaging. "If we do not understand what happens in politics, it will be very difficult to interfere in the construction of policies," he said. Oyuela chaired the group created by the First Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to negotiate a legally binding instrument on climate change today known as the Kyoto Protocol.
"There are many people from the member churches of the World Council of Churches in international diplomatic circles that deal with environmental issues,” he said, pressing the issue that the church can influence power. “If theologically, the WCC proposes ethical reference points, why not strengthen the process of awareness raising and advocacy among these actors, so that the agenda has a more significant impact on the final results of the negotiations?"
"We Christians warned, some years ago, about the urgent need to promote an ethic of social responsibility on the management of natural resources and care for creation, something we called 'stewardship for creation'”, Salibian reminded the audience. “This concept still is in opposition to the current dominant school of thought asserting the supremacy of economy over nature, which becomes oppressive to many humans, and breaks the relationships of people with nature."
Reinforcing the need for a review of the Latin American theology, the WCC programme executive on climate change, Dr Guillermo Kerber, from Uruguay, added that one of the main impacts of climate change on theology is the emerging need to reform the theological understanding of creation. "What is the place of the human being in creation and in relation to it? We need an epistemological change of our theology in relation to ecology," Kerber said.

Peace with the earth”

One of the methodological efforts made during the event has been the attempt to explain the links between violence, peace-building and care for creation. This reflects one of the main themes, “peace with the earth”, of the upcoming International Ecumenical Peace Convocation (IEPC) being held 17-25 May in Kingston, Jamaica and sponsored by the WCC, the Caribbean Conference of Churches and the Jamaica Council of Churches.

Emerging from the seminar in Argentina is a holistic view trying to build on the acknowledgement that the environmental crisis resulting from climate change has economic, political and spiritual components.

The impact of climate change, particularly on migration, is leading to an ethically-based debate on the issue of justice involving the testimony of the most vulnerable groups such as women, impoverished and indigenous people.

"We must recognize that justice is a central theme in the Bible. The God of the Bible is a God of justice who does justice. Therefore, we include in our theology the issue of 'eco-justice'", said Kerber.

This is not the first time that the WCC and its member churches have been supporting dialogue and reflection on ecology and theology in Argentina.

In addition to an event under the theme "Man and His Environment" in 1974, there was also a seminar in 1990 on "Crisis, Ecology and Social Justice". The seminar, hosted by ISEDET, was held in preparation of the Call for Justice Peace and Integrity of Creation (JPIC), held that year in Seoul, South Korea.

Thursday, 3 April 2008

Fuel vs Food

graphic: enviro.org.au (footnotes below)
Ethanol production increases not reduces green house gas emissions, according to scientists. US corn ethanol, touted as cutting fuel GHG by 20%, will almost double them in 30 years and the effect will last for 167 years (1). Worldwide, crop biofuels will release 17 to 420 times more CO2 than the fossil fuel they replace (2). The only alternative, next generation biofuel from perennial grasses, depends on still unproven technology.

Impacts on ecosystems and human security are severe, lack hard statistics, and lag years behind futures markets hype. "Green deserts" were created by megaprojects in Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay -- where rich landowners and investors clearcut rainforest, drove out native people and small farmers, often with violence, and imposed GMO / chemical monocultures. There is now evidence from Argentina and Brazil that their bonanza profits lasted only a few years, soil fertility fell, while chemical use doubled (3); people have been poisoned by reckless pesticide spraying (4); nitrate fertilizers pollute wells and rivers (5). Fertilizers and farm mechanization, both based on fossil fuel, increase emissions. Alarmingly, many of these projects were financed by "carbon offsets" and the misnamed "Clean Development Mechanism" of Kyoto (6).

Madhu Khanna, a University of Illinois professor of agricultural and consumer economics, was one of the experts in a Feb 2008 roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels, Gender Equity and Human Security. In a UI News interview she says:

The food vs. fuel debate is real and can only be expected to intensify in the near future...Given the questionable environmental benefits of corn-based ethanol, the large diversion of corn from food/feed that it requires and the limited potential to rely on it to achieve meaningful independence from foreign oil there is a need to rethink our current policy.

Since Congress subsidies in 2005, corn prices doubled despite a huge expanse in acreage. Soy and wheat prices also rose. 90% percent of ethanol distilleries popping up across the United States are corn-based. Diverting half of US corn from food to fuel only meets 10% of of our current gas-guzzling, she points out:

The recent Energy Bill sets ambitious mandates for renewable fuel production of 36 billion gallons annually by 2022. Of this, 15 billion gallons is expected to be corn-based ethanol; this would represent less than ten percent of our annual gasoline consumption in the US and require using 50 percent of our current corn production for fuel production... World prices of food and feed are likely to rise even further with potentially adverse impacts on net food importing developing countries as well as on the poor in urban populations.

It is already happening: in early 2008 there were food riots in a number of countries.(7)

Next-generation alternatives to corn ethanol include dedicated energy crops, such as Miscanthus x giganteus and Switchgrass, crop residues like corn stover and wheat straw and municipal wastes. These feedstocks can be used to produce ligno-cellulosic biofuels. Miscanthus and switchgrass are high yielding perennial grasses with low input requirements that can be grown under a wide range of growing conditions in the midwest and southern regions of the US. They have the potential to more than double the gallons of ethanol that can be obtained per acre and are expected to have a significantly lower greenhouse gas intensity than corn ethanol. These grasses also reduce soil erosion and nitrogen run-off. However, the commercial viability of converting these next generation feedstocks into biofuels is highly dependent on technological breakthroughs that are still in the pipeline.

Footnotes
(1) T. Searchinger, et al "Use of U.S. Croplands" in AAAS Science Feb 2008
(2) Joseph Fargione, et al. "Land Clearing" in AAAS Science Feb 2008; W Laurance, "US corn subsidies promote Amazon deforestation¨ in Science Dec 2007, reported by Enviro.org.au.
(3)
"Soyabean in Argentina" in Wikipedia Monsanto; on Brazil, Institute of Science in Society UK, Climate Ark.
(4) pesticide poisoning in LaSoyaMata; "fumigation" in Independent Science Panel, Indymedia and GRR.
(5) green deserts: see Guardian 2004. For those caused by eucalyptus monoculture for paper see WRM, Chris Lang's blog, police violence against dispossessed natives, protests led by MST, Via Campesina, FoE in 2007-08, video of Brazil women's leader Arlete Pinheiro.
(6) carbon financing: Red Pepper Sep 2006, Guardian Feb 2007,
Environment New Net on dubious certifications (for CDM).
(7) "Food Crisis," BiofuelWatch Feb 2008.
---------
See Wikipedia on biofuel, second and third generation; updates in Science; our previous postings peak everything and biofuel debate. Brazil cropdusting videos one, two.
Videos of small farmer-campesino-peasant activists around the world: All Raised Voices.
En español: Grupo de Reflexión Rural con audios, Via Campesina, La Soja Mata. Videos contra las papeleras.