Showing posts with label Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES). Show all posts

Tuesday, 22 April 2014

Signs of spring -- developing countries protest Green Climate Fund

Though the German Green Party's Boell Foundation presents this deadlock as a crisis, it is actually good news. Further attempts by the rich countries, business & finance lobbyists to monetize / commodify the commons are being blocked at the UNFCCC's Green Climate Fund
2009 funding of the GCF
by poor countries -- another example of the tensions that have existed in climate and MDG/SDG negotiations since 2005, and that were exemplified in QEW's Chicago sign-on which went out sometime to-day to our Quaker partners under our 5-way agreement. For further news about the developing countries' demands for Sustainable Development goals, see peoplesgoals.org/join-the-campaign 

Not surprisingly, the official campaign for "leveraging private investment" would benefit the rich countries and Wall St, leaving the poor further in debt, without consultation/safeguards/monitoring, and forced to allow pillage of their natural resources to pay for it all -- an updated version of the infamous Washington consensus.

Excerpt from the actual Boell report (my emphasis in yellow)

"The sixth meeting of the Board of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) in Bali from February 19–February 21, 2014 was meant to propel the new Fund toward full operationalization by year’s end. 
After Bali, however, this tightly timed goal – which included the expected start of the GCF’s resource mobilization efforts in connection with the UN Secretary General’s extraordinary climate summit in New York on September 23rd – is in peril. 

"The 24 Board members left Bali with only a handful of actual decisions taken and many more postponed for the next Board meeting in late May, after old tensions between developed and developing countries flared up. At issue are competing approaches on how the GCF should support the paradigm shift towards low-carbon and climate-resilient development in recipient countries. Will the GCF operate as a fund closely 
tied to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) passing on primarily 
concessional public finance to all eligible Non-Annex I-Countries under the Convention? Or is the 
GCF to develop eventually into a more full-fledged climate bank with complex financial instruments* which could prioritize public funding to leverage private sector engagement  in only a few competitively selected countries and investment opportunities? 
[* for example: New Market Mechanisms, REDD, PES, LULUCF, Ocean offsets, green bonds, green economy -- to name only a few of the MOI proposed by the official UN campaign and its business allies in Global Partnership]

Wednesday, 24 August 2011

Wonderful Life: 8.7 Million species -- announces a new study by Mora, Tittensor, Adi, Simpson, Worm.

Cross-posted from UNEP News Centre.

Photo: UNEP, shutterstock/Tischenko Irina
There are 8.7 million (+/- 1.3m) species on Earth, three times previous counts and the most precise calculation yet. Until now, the number of species on Earth was said to fall somewhere between 3 million and 100 million. The new study was published today by PLoS.

Around 6.5 million species are found on land and 2.2 million (about 25 percent of the total) in the ocean. 86% of the former and 91% of the latter have yet to be discovered, described or catalogued. The 8.7 million estimate  is based on an innovative, validated analytical technique that dramatically narrows the range of previous estimates.

Says lead author Camilo Mora of the University of Hawaii and Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada: "The question of how many species exist has intrigued scientists for centuries and the answer, coupled with research by others into species' distribution and abundance, is particularly important now because a host of human activities and influences are accelerating the rate of extinctions. Many species may vanish before we even know of their existence, of their unique niche and function in ecosystems, and of their potential contribution to improved human wellbeing."

"This work deduces the most basic number needed to describe our living biosphere," says coauthor Boris Worm of Dalhousie University. "If we did not know - even by an order of magnitude (1 million? 10 million? 100 million?) - the number of people in a nation, how would we plan for the future?"
"It is the same with biodiversity. Humanity has committed itself to saving species from extinction, but until now we have had little real idea of even how many there are."

Dr. Worm notes that the recently-updated Red List issued by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature assessed 59,508 species, of which 19,625 are classified as threatened. This means the IUCN Red List, the most sophisticated ongoing study of its kind, monitors less than 1% of world species.

The research is published with a commentary by Lord Robert May of Oxford, past president of the UK's Royal Society, who praises the researchers' "imaginative new approach." He says, "It is a remarkable testament to humanity's narcissism that we know the number of books in the US Library of Congress on 1 February 2011 was 22,194,656, but cannot tell you - to within an order-of-magnitude - how many distinct species of plants and animals we share our world with... we increasingly recognise that such knowledge is important for full understanding of the ecological and evolutionary processes which created, and which are struggling to maintain, the diverse biological riches we are heir to. Such biodiversity is much more than beauty and wonder, important though that is. It also underpins ecosystem services [not counted by conventional economics] that humanity is dependent upon."

Drawing conclusions from 253 years of taxonomy since Linnaeus

Swedish scientist Carl Linnaeus created and published in 1758 the system still used to formally name and describe species. In the 253 years since, about 1.25 million species - roughly 1 million on land and 250,000 in the oceans - have been described and entered into central databases (roughly 700,000 more are thought to have been described but have yet to reach the central databases).

To now, the best approximation of Earth's species total was based on the educated guesses and opinions of experts, who variously pegged the figure in a range from 3 to 100 million ? wildly differing numbers questioned because there is no way to validate them.

Drs. Mora and Worm, together with Dalhousie colleagues Derek P. Tittensor, Sina Adl and Alastair G.B. Simpson, refined the estimated species total to 8.7 million by identifying numerical patterns within the taxonomic classification system (which groups forms of life in a pyramid-like hierarchy, ranked upwards from species to genus, family, order, class, phylum, kingdom and domain). Analysing the taxonomic clustering of the 1.2 million species today in the Catalogue of Life and the World Register of Marine Species, the researchers discovered reliable numerical relationships between the more complete higher taxonomic levels and the species level.

Says Dr. Adl: "We discovered that, using numbers from the higher taxonomic groups, we can predict the number of species. The approach accurately predicted the number of species in several well-studied groups such as mammals, fishes and birds, providing confidence in the method."

When applied to all five known eukaryote* kingdoms of life on Earth, the approach predicted:
1) ~7.77 million species of animals (of which 953,434 have been described and cataloged)
2) ~298,000 species of plants (of which 215,644 have been described and cataloged)
3) ~611,000 species of fungi (moulds, mushrooms) (of which 43,271 have been described and
cataloged)
4) ~36,400 species of protozoa (single-cell organisms with animal-like behavior, eg. movement,
of which 8,118 have been described and cataloged)
5) ~27,500 species of chromists (including, eg. brown algae, diatoms, water moulds, of which 13,033 have been described and cataloged)
Total: 8.74 million eukaryote species on Earth.
(* Organisms in the eukaryote domain have cells containing complex structures enclosed within membranes. The study looked only at forms of life accorded, or potentially accorded, the status of "species" by scientists. Not included: certain micro-organisms and virus "types", for example, which could be highly numerous.)

Within the 8.74 million total is an estimated 2.2 million (plus or minus 180,000) marine species of all kinds, about 250,000 (11%) of which have been described and catalogued. When it formally concluded in October 2010, the Census of Marine Life offered a conservative estimate of 1 million+ species in the seas.

"Like astronomers, marine scientists are using sophisticated new tools and techniques to peer into places never seen before," says Australian Ian Poiner, Chair of the Census' Scientific Steering Committee. "During the 10-year Census, hundreds of marine explorers had the unique human experience and privilege of encountering and naming animals new to science. We may clearly enjoy the Age of Discovery for many years to come."

"The immense effort entering all known species in taxonomic databases such as the Catalogue of Life and the World Register of Marine Species makes our analysis possible," says co-author Derek Tittensor, who also works with Microsoft Research and UNEP's World Conservation Monitoring Centre. "As these databases grow and improve, our method can be refined and updated to provide an even more precise estimate."

"We have only begun to uncover the tremendous variety of life around us," says co-author Alastair Simpson. "The richest environments for prospecting new species are thought to be coral reefs, seafloor mud and moist tropical soils. But smaller life forms are not well known anywhere. Some unknown species are living in our own backyards - literally."

"Awaiting our discovery are a half million fungi and moulds whose relatives gave humanity bread and cheese," says Jesse Ausubel, Vice-President of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and cofounder of the Census of Marine Life. "For species discovery, the 21st century may be a fungal century!"
Mr. Ausubel notes the enigma of why so much diversity exists, saying the answer may lie in the notions that nature fills every niche, and that rare species are poised to benefit from a change of conditions.

In his analysis, Lord May says the practical benefits of taxonomic discovery are many, citing the development in the 1970s of a new strain of rice based on a cross between conventional species and one discovered in the wild. The result: 30% more grain yield, followed by efforts ever since to protect all wild varieties of rice, "which obviously can only be done if we have the appropriate taxonomic knowledge."

"Given the looming problems of feeding a still-growing world population, the potential benefits of ramping up such exploration are clear."

Based on current costs and requirements, the study suggests that describing all remaining species using traditional approaches could require up to 1,200 years of work by more than 300,000 taxonomists at an approximate cost of $US 364 billion. Fortunately, new techniques such as DNA barcoding are radically reducing the cost and time involved in new species identification.

Concludes Dr. Mora: "With the clock of extinction now ticking faster for many species, I believe speeding the inventory of Earth's species merits high scientific and societal priority. Renewed interest in further exploration and taxonomy could allow us to fully answer this most basic question: What lives on Earth?"
***
For a seminal work on the fragility of life on earth, see the late Stephen Jay Gould's Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History (1989); and Elizabeth Kolbert, "The sixth extinction" from Field Notes from a Catastrophe: Man, Nature, and Climate Change (2006). For the latest PES campaign, see UNEP, An Ecosystems Approach to Water and Food Security (Aug 2011) and Wikipedia on PES.



Monday, 21 March 2011

Carbon Trading: how it works and why it fails -- by Oscar Reyes and Tamra Gilbertson

Carbon trading lies at the centre of global climate policy and is projected to become one of the world’s largest commodities markets, yet it has a disastrous track record since its adoption as part of the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) administered by the UN.

Carbon Trading: how it works and why it fails (2009), by Oscar Reyes and Tamra Gilbertson, in Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation's Critical Currents series, shows the limitations of climate action within the assumptions of neoliberal economics. The EU Emissions Trading Scheme, the world’s largest carbon market, has failed to 'cap' emissions, while the Kyoto CDM routinely favours environmentally ineffective and socially unjust projects. Examples are given from CDM projects in Brazil, Indonesia, India and Thailand.

Cancún, the UN "green economy" and Rio+20 campaign, all propose ways of expanding the trading experiment -- with Copenhagen Accord pledges, REDD+, and PES. This report says it should be abandoned. There are many ways forward without carbon trading – subsidy shifting, energy efficiency, regulation and an FTT tax on financial speculation -- but there are no "market" short-cuts if climate change is to be addressed in a just and fair manner.

"Anyone who still thinks that creating a carbon casino can solve our climate crisis owes it to themselves to read this book. The most convincing and concise challenge to the green profiteers yet."Naomi Klein, author, The Shock Doctrine.

"Carbon markets are less about reducing emissions than making carbon cuts as cheap as possible for large corporations." – Maud Barlow, Blue Planet Project.

"The Copenhagen Accord effectively kills Kyoto, replacing it with voluntary commitments –- ineffective and dangerous. The Cancún text systematically excludes Cochabamba proposals of the World Peoples' Conference on Climate Change: full recognition of indigenous rights, rights for nature, an appeal tribunal. It gives a green light to REDD, rewarding those responsible for deforestation while dispossessing indigenous and forest dwellers." – Nick Buxton, Transnational Institute (TNI)
 ***
See also Asian NGOs' 27-point Platform for Climate Justice (2009),  and the Biodiversity justice declaration (Oct 2010).