Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts

Saturday, 8 March 2014

Musical bridge-building between Israel-Palestine -- David Broza

Singer-composer David Broza was born in Haifa in 1955, lived in England, Spain (where he learned flamenco, a major element in his music), while still in his teens served in the Israeli army and played in cafes. Since then he has lived in the USA and Israel, where he has become one of the leading voices of the peace movement. In 1977, when he was 22, he wrote יהיה טוב (Yehieh Tov: Things will Get Better) which became the anthem of the peace movement. This is his 2013 performance of the song in New York.


In the 1980s his grandfather joined the bicultural Arab-Israeli peace settlement, NeveShalom – Wāħat as-Salām (The Oasis of Peace) and its School of Peace, which in 1989 won the Beyond War Award, and inspired a continuing Jewish-Palestinian Living Room Dialogue Group in the USA. Grace Feuerverger's book Oasis of Dreams: Teaching and Learning Peace in a Jewish-Palestinian Village (2001) quotes one of the villagers:
The Neve Shalom/Wahat Al-Salam experience humanizes the conflict.It is called an oasis, but only as compared to other areas in the country. The village has many difficulties but at least we are not being broken. We do have personal squabbles as in any village, but we are living the conflict instead of fighting it.
Out of this experience has come his latest album, East Jerusalem/West Jerusalem (listen to the online sampler), just released on S-Curve Records, in which Israeli and Palestinian musicians, including the Mira Awad, Shaa'nan Streett of Hadag Nahash, West Bank rap duo G-Town and Wyclef Jean play together. 
One of his best-beloved songs is בלב שלי (BelibiIn my heart) from the album Parking Completo. In this 2009 video it is sung at Masada with a joint Arab-Israeli child choir:

Monday, 3 March 2014

Negawatts and negalitres: steps to a sustainable future

Conservation and efficiency should be measured in negawatts (for energy) and negalitres (for water). These steps have been proposed to the UN General Assembly's OWG studying targets and indicators for Sustainable Development Goals. 

The idea originally came to Amory Lovins when a coal-burning utility sent him a bill with a typo: "negawatt" instead of megawatt. Inspiration struck, when he realized that to consumers there was no difference; that avoided use (i.e. conservation by the consumer, or energy efficiency by the producer) would always be cheaper than new "hard energy". A win-win. But North American utilities have a different ideology: they prefer to blindly continue using massive amounts of fossil fuels, to predict endless rises in demand, lure industry with artificially with cheap rates, and lobby legislators to stick it to householders. So his Rocky Mountain Institute has led a campaign for "soft energy" for more than three decades. See his video Reinventing Fire, reviewed in our blog in 2010.

Measuring energy in negawatts negalitres would not only demonstrate cost savings. It would deliver more human benefit from the same throughput of resources, a concept that needs to be applied to all products of the Earth if planetary boundaries are to be respected, and human needs to be met.
Ecojustice: planetary boundaries and human needs: Kate Raworth's Oxfam doughnut

According to Lovins, gradual but mindful personal lifestyle changes can provide:
20% of negawatts from personal conservation + 20% from energy efficiency = 40% reduction
courtesy smartenergyliving.org
According to the Union of Concerned Scientists' figures, that is the equivalent of eliminating over 500 coal plants! Despite the claims of industry lobbyists, the process could be gradual, eliminate no jobs, and start with the dirtiest plants. A mandatory 5% yearly reduction in all fossil and mineral energy sources over 17 years would result in over 80% reduction in CO2 emissions and noxious pollutants.

And renewable energy increase of 5% a year is quite possible! For example, by solar rooftops. They may already be cheaper than normally generated electricity, according to to new report by Rocky Mountain Institute.

References: RMI, The Economics of grid defection, Feb 2014; OWG, Focus areas of the SDGs, Feb 2014; GEAS report Feb 2014, summarizing IPCC5 and UNEP EmissionsGap Report 2013.

Related concepts: Herman Daly on "throughput" in a steady-state economy, cradle-to-cradle design, Lovins' negawatt and soft energy path (20% efficiency + 20% conservation= 40% reduction in use of present fossil source and GHG emissions), County of Maui water conservation, GCI contraction and convergence, CBDR, Raworth's Oxfam doughnut (satisfy human needs while respecting planetary boundaries), a mandatory renewable portfolio standard, solar rooftops in the US, zero-energy bottle lighting in Kenya.

Thanks to Quaker economic analyst Jack Bradin for this overview. See also David Roberts, "Preventing climate change and adapting to it are not morally equivalent" Grist 16 Sep 2014

Thursday, 12 December 2013

Slam Shell -- by Peng! Collective.

Yesterday in Berlin, Shell Oil held a Science Slam to showcase young scientists` ideas about renewable energies and puff up its image of corporate responsibility. 

German activists who oppose Arctic drilling hacked the greenwashing party with a prank reminiscent of North America's Yes men -- reminding Shell that pretending to support 'green' projects is not good enough, that Arctic drilling is an unrecoverable accident waiting to happen.

Peng! Collective may not have the money Shell has, with just €300 budget for what should be a $3 million campaign, but they have passion and imagination.  Visit the website SlamShell.com, inform yourself and donate.   


More about the whole context of Arctic drilling
USGS estimates the Arctic could add 13% to world oil consumption. US National Research Council experts warn Business As Usual trends could bring sudden and surprising climate "tipping points" : floods, droughts, storms, sealevel rise. The SEC fails to demand transparency from extractive industries. The EPA greatly underestimated methane emissions. The US govt is selling more gas and oil leases in the Arctic. Ocean Conservancy and NRDC warn, among other reasons, that spill recovery there could face sea ice up to 25 feet thick, hurricane-force storms and 20-foot swells. They cite last year's near-disaster (only [!] 3 killed, no spill) of Shell’s oil rig, Kulluk, in a place with no access roads, only a few small airports and the nearest Coast Guard station 1,000 miles away. Inuit have called for a moratorium. The Arctic drilling rush includes Russia, Norway, Canada, Denmark and Iceland; with possible armed conflict over boundaries, says the NYTimes, quoting NATO’s top military commander. How many reasons do we need NOT to drill? Then why and how are we doing it?
Cartoon by Seppo Leinonen, www.seppo.net/e/

More at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleum_exploration_in_the_Arctic

Monday, 21 October 2013

native musicians Cris Derksen & Swil Kanim

A rising star on the Canadian classical/jazz/folk/pop/electronic scenes, cellist Derksen’s music (listen here) draws from traditional classical training, her Aboriginal ancestry and new school electronics, to create genre-defying music. (cross-posted from CBC's 8th Fire series.]
Chris Dirkson.jpg I am a half Cree, half Mennonite person living in East Vancouver. I come from North Tallcree First Nation and this little Mennonite town called La Crete in Northern Alberta. I grew up mostly in Edmonton, Alberta where I learned how to play the cello. I’m pretty glad I did, it is a pretty great and weird job to have.
One thing I liked about growing up in a city is that I had access to things I wouldn’t have living on a reserve far north like mine, such as music lessons. But I also missed out on things I would have learned growing up on a reserve and I wasn’t able to see my Kokum and Mosom very often. I’m not sad about it; it is just how my path was laid out for me. These days I travel a lot and have gotten to see a lot of the world through playing music with many great musicians. I am lucky that many of the people I travel with are also Indigenous, because this makes for good times, great laughs and deep understanding. I hope you enjoy 8TH FIRE as much as I did. I am very grateful to be part of this series. It seems to have come at a very poignant time in Canadian Aboriginal history.

She set this classic Haida tale to music, in collaboration with Red Haida graphic novelist Yahgulanaas aka Michael Nicoll.

from her website crisderksen.virb.com

Salish violinist-composer-storyteller Swil Kanim is from the Lummi reserve near Bellingham WA.
credit: JavaColleen blog
Like many native children he was taken from his parents and spent the remainder of his childhood in foster homes. One of his teachers encouraged him to enroll in a music program, and the violin became his music instrument of choice. Through music, he found his path to healing childhood wounds and reconnect to his native roots.

Swil Kanim's compositions incorporate classical influences as well as musical interpretations of his journey from depression and despair to spiritual and emotional freedom. Listen to his Works for the People (2003) at swilkanim.com

His workshops, The Elements of Honor,  inspire people of all origins to express themselves at conferences, workshops, school assemblies, and rehabilitation centers. He travels extensively throughout the United States, enchanting audiences with his original composition music and native storytelling. The Tree Story is an example of this work.

For more contemporary native artists, see Beat Nation.

Sunday, 21 July 2013

Everyday miracles 4: transforming trauma in community -- by Lucy Duncan, AFSC

Cross-posted with the author's permission from the American Friends Service Committee website. This is the first of a series of blog posts on a Healing and Rebuilding our Communities workshop in May 2013. It shows what N. Americans can learn from HROC developed by Quakers in Africa. See our previous posts about AGLI.

"Unless pain is transformed, it will be transferred." -- Richard Rohr, quoted by Amy Rakusin
When I was in Burundi after the World Conference of Friends in 2012, I visited a Peace Village outside Bujumbura where Hutu and Tutsi refugees were living. AFSC staff Triphonie Habonimana and Florence Ntakarutimana of Healing and Rebuilding our Communities (HROC) program served as my hosts. They brought together perpetrators and victims of the decades-long conflict that had participated in the trauma healing workshops that HROC conducts in Bujumbura and elsewhere, sometimes in partnership with AFSC. The participants gathered in a small Friends church in the village and told me how the workshops had impacted them.
Just a little water/stress
Each of them told stories of transformation: victims talked of forgiving horrendous acts perpetrated on them, and perpetrators talked about how they had reconnected with those they had harmed and had been healed from the shock of their acts. Listening to these stories of such deep and seemingly lasting change, it sounded like the workshops must work magic for there to be such healing. I wanted to learn more.

In mid-May three of us from AFSC participated in one of these three-day HROC workshops in Baltimore at Stony Run Meeting, led by one of my hosts in Burundi, Florence Ntakarutimana, as well as Americans Amy Rakusin and Bill Jacobsen.

During the workshop a woman who was a trauma nurse talked about how, with physical trauma, the wound often needs to be abraded, opened, exposed in order for there to be healing; if the wound isn't cleaned and opened, it festers and can get worse or cause the loss of a limb, or even death.

This is true with wounds of the spirit, too. People can suffer spiritual death if they hold their wounds too tightly; they can let their hearts turn to stone.
Water/stress overfilling glassIn one activity on the first day, Florence provided a vivid demonstration of how stress and trauma operate in individuals and impact the community. She put a large glass on a tray in the middle of the room, with a pitcher of water next to it. She said, "Things happen that cause stress."
"In Burundi, it's sometimes not so easy to get breakfast for your children. They go to school without tea. One day you might not have bread."
She filled the glass about a quarter full of water--the water was the stress, and the cup was the person without bread for their child.
She said, "You don't have bread, but the next day you get some and feed your children. You feel better."
Florence poured most of the water back out of the glass. She said, "You feel better, but not all of the stress is gone, the stress you've known."

Florence said, "Normal stress comes and goes."
"But let's say, I am here in the United States and I get a phone call that my first born is in the hospital." Florence filled the glass nearly to the top with water.
"And then I get another call, my son has died. Now I have no more space to hold the stress." Florence filled the glass until it overflowed, the water spilled out onto the tray.
Water/stress and wood"Then I return to Burundi and my husband is hit by a car and dies. This kind of stress is hard, it makes a hard place in my belly." She added a piece of wood to the cup and more water spilled out onto the tray. The wood represented repeated, difficult events in one’s life, but not necessarily ones that people planned.

Florence said, "And some stress is like stones, it breaks me."
"What if some parents raped their own children and killed them… this is like a stone, a stone in one's heart."
Florence put a large stone into the glass. The water overflowed into the tray.
"This kind of stress is beyond what we can hold, beyond our capacity to hold."
"This is traumatic stress. Sometimes we experience or perpetrate such hard things, sometimes our heart is broken, there are scars and they remain. Some wounds are fresh, others aren't fresh, but they are still there."
Water/stress, wood and stone

"Some are caused by natural disasters, but the hardest are those that people planned. This kind of stress causes trauma, because of what we have heard, what we have seen, or what we have done. There is also cumulative stress; all together things are so hard to bear. When you live on the edge of stress, it can be what seems to be a small thing that puts you over the edge."
"What if your parents experienced trauma and haven't healed, then you could be born with a stone in your belly, and that makes it hard to bear stress, to be resilient."

Florence invited us to look at the tray. The tray holding the glass was full of water. "The family and community around the person who has experienced or is experiencing stress and trauma also is affected because the trauma, the pain, the stress overflows into the community."

Sharing, she said, is critical in the healing process. In order for people to heal, it is important for them to expose the trauma they’ve experienced to the light and re-discover the threads of human care and connection. "The more we are able to open our hearts, the more we can let love in," Florence said. As people share in community, the more all can sit together in the mystery and face what is unknown together.

This was the first day of three. In the next two days we explored how the stones of trauma can be softened and melted. We learned how the water in that overflowing glass can be replaced by healing waters from the community through sharing and that as each person heals, they can support the healing of others.

On that first day I was already beginning to see that through this very intentional and powerful, but quite simple, process the healing that occurs isn’t magic, but is miraculous nonetheless.

Thursday, 11 April 2013

The State of the Planet -- by Hugh Robertson

We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations. . . We will preserve our planet, commended to our care by God.  

President Obama's inaugural address January 2013.
 


These stirring words gave hope to millions around the world who were despairing for the future of the planet. At last, a major international leader was taking a stand. But facing Congress a few weeks later, the president was more muted about the environment in his State of the Union address. A brief reference to combating climate change “for the sake of our children and our future” was tucked away in the middle of his speech, sandwiched between the need for energy self-sufficiency and curbing climate change using market-based solutions while “driving strong economic growth.”

Why had the lofty sentiments about the state of the planet dissipated in a matter of weeks? Was it the reality of dealing with a fractious legislature who oppose action on climate change? Was it the need to placate the business community and the fossil fuel lobby? Perhaps he was pandering to consumers who also happen to be voters.

In Canada, however, there were no stirring words about the state of the planet in the last Speech from the Throne in June 2011. There was no ennobling vision for the future of our children and grandchildren. There was not even a reference to the dangers of climate change.
The monotonous mantra of low taxes, jobs, prosperity and economic growth dominated the address, punctuated with depressing references to the need for law and order legislation and eliminating the gun registry. Mention of the “natural environment” was limited to the creation of parks and to the importance of developing our natural resource wealth which would take place under “improved regulatory and environmental assessment.”

The Throne Speech is a major address that outlines the focus of the government’s policy and legislative priorities. The War of 1812 merited mention but not the rapidly deteriorating climatic conditions across Canada and especially their impact on our indigenous people in the North. We spent more money in 2012 commemorating the bicentennial of a minor war than we spent on climate change. Strange priorities.

The three speeches, which could all be described as “State of the Nation” addresses, offer an interesting contrast. The presidential inaugural speech included some inspiring words about the plight of the planet but the details of the State of the Union address lacked the passion and commitment of the earlier speech. The Canadian Throne speech simply made no pretence about planetary concerns and subsequent legislation has confirmed that position.

How can the president pledge to speed up new oil and gas permits in his quest for energy self-sufficiency when they will involve the destructive process of fracking which will lead to cheaper fossil fuel prices, more consumption and sky-high greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions? Market-based solutions tend to favour the wealthy and the wealthy pollute more than any other socio-economic group, while “driving strong economic growth” on a planet with finite resources and a rapidly declining biocapacity is folly.

Like the US presidential addresses, the visions outlined in the Canadian Throne and Budget speeches do not always reflect what is ultimately enacted in Parliament. The “forked tongue” is still too prevalent in our public discourse.

For example, the Canadian Budget Implementation Bill of 2012 (Omnibus Bill C-38) stripped away most existing environmental protective measures, proclaiming “open season” on our resources and unleashing potentially disastrous ecological outcomes. What had been implied in the Throne Speech in 2011 was not “development” of our natural wealth but “exploitation,” making the reference to “improved environmental assessment” nothing short of cynical.

A government that has spent a hundred million dollars promoting and publicizing an Economic Action Plan that will have a negative impact on nature has just closed down the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA) project to save a paltry two million dollars. The ELA, comprising 58 lakes, is an internationally renowned fresh-water research station in north western Ontario. The priorities of our government – and the motives – get stranger.

The resource and energy development programs of the Canadian and US governments are not consistent with the long term protection of the planet. There is nothing “ethical” about fracked oil and tar sands bitumen and there is no scientific basis for “clean coal.” Furthermore, programs that promote pipelines, low taxes, economic growth, prosperity and more consumption will simply exacerbate environmental problems.

Our most important – and urgent – societal challenge in North America is to shift the focus from the “state of the nation” to the “state of the planet.” Individually and collectively, this must be our paradigm shift.

An unlikely ally

A powerful message on the precarious state of the planet is coming from a most unlikely quarter: the business and financial community. Prominent individuals and organizations are looking beyond narrow national interests to the concerns of the larger world. How ironic that we may be looking to business and finance to provide enlightened and inspiring leadership on environmental issues.

A number of reports have been issued over the past three months by major international organizations alerting us to the dangers of ecological degradation. The first of these, by PricewaterhouseCoopers, the world’s largest professional services firm, warned in November, 2012 that global society may have passed a critical threshold: unless we “decarbonize” our economies immediately, we cannot restrict temperature increases to two degrees C. If uncontrolled, GHG emissions could propel the planet to a six degree warming by 2100.

Also in November, 2012, the World Bank issued its ground-breaking report Turn down the heat: Why a four degree warmer world must be avoided, prepared by the Potsdam Institute, one of the top climate research bodies in the world. According to the report, GHG concentrations in the atmosphere are higher than at any other time in the past fifteen million years. Emissions are projected to hit 400 parts per million (ppm) by 2020 which will push us over the two degree C. temperature increase ceiling agreed to at the Copenhagen conference in 2009. The report actually questions whether human adaptation to a four degree increase is even possible.

The World Economic Forum meets in Davos, Switzerland each January. It is a gathering of top business leaders, bankers, politicians, intellectuals and journalists. This year’s get-together was unusual for the outspoken comments on our troubled planet by a number of prominent individuals.
Selected comments that are remarkably blunt from Christine Lagarde, head of the International Monetary Fund, during the conference clearly illustrate her concerns:
  • The science is sobering – 2012 was among the hottest years since records began in 1880.
  • Unless we take action on climate change, future generations will be "roasted, toasted, fried and grilled". 
  • Without concerted action, the very future of our planet is in peril.
Jim Yong Kim, president of the World Bank, who commissioned the Potsdam report, had an op-ed column published in the Washington Post during the Davos meeting. He appealed to governments and people world-wide to concentrate on reducing emissions, focusing on low carbon growth and building resilient societies. “The world needs a bold global approach to help avoid the climate catastrophe it faces today. The planet, our home, cannot wait.”

Lord Nicholas Stern, former chief economist for the World Bank and renowned for his report in 2006 warning about the dangers of a warming planet, admitted in an interview at Davos that he had underestimated the risk of rising temperatures. He acknowledged that GHG emissions are increasing at so rapid a pace that the planet is losing its ability to absorb the escalating carbon dioxide concentrations. He fears that we are on track for at least a four degree rise in global temperatures.

How refreshing to hear the candour of some of the world’s business and financial elites calling for action on global warming. They have the courage to level with us in plain language about the gravity of our situation. Some may question their sincerity but their central message that economic well-being, human health, social stability and biodiversity are all dependent on a vital and vibrant planet is undeniable.

Our governments in North America, beholden to their electorates and focused on power, do not have the courage to level with us. We are still rooted in age of narcissistic nationalism where the interests of the nation-state trump the needs of the global community. Globalization is merely a market and a trade term, not an ethical imperative.

Annus horribilis

Queen Elizabeth popularized the term “annus horribilis” in a speech in November, 1992 when she used the Latin phrase to describe a series of family events that had attracted negative public attention. “Annus horribilis” can be aptly used to describe the weather events of 2012 which, because of our conveniently short memories, may already have been forgotten.
  • The continental US experienced its hottest year in history, and every state had above average annual temperatures. July was the hottest month ever in the US. Drought covered almost two thirds of the country and crop yields were down significantly. The record year culminated with the onslaught by Superstorm Sandy, fueled by warmer ocean water and violent winds loaded with extra water vapour, a phenomenon that was almost certainly caused by anthropogenic activity.
  • Canada is heating up faster than nearly every other country on the planet. The summer of 2012 was the warmest on record. Remarkably, our winter average temperatures have risen over three degrees since 1950, a period that has coincided with the most dramatic increases in GHG emissions since the Industrial Revolution of the 18th century.
  • Perhaps the most alarming event of 2012 was the collapse of the Arctic ice sheet. Summer sea ice has been declining for years, but warmer winters are now inhibiting winter refreezing and, consequently, the overall volume of the ice cover is down dramatically. The summer sea ice will probably be gone in a decade and the heating of the exposed water will expedite a feedback process that will reinforce the warming trend with unpredictable weather and climate consequences.
  • The global oceans are in triple trouble. The seas are warming, especially at deeper levels, and acidification of surface water because of excess atmospheric carbon dioxide is leading to world-wide “osteoporosis” of shellfish and coral reefs. Now mercury concentrations, primarily from coal-fired power plants and gold mining, are on the rise, exposing coastal communities to a reappearance of the scourge of Minamata disease.
  • Changes in precipitation patterns and temperature ranges are having a devastating effect on global biodiversity as numerous species disappear because they cannot make the necessary biological adjustments to rapidly changing natural conditions. Ecosystems, such as the coniferous forests of British Columbia and Alberta are falling prey to the invasion of beetles that are now able to survive the warmer winters.
  • The National Oceanic Atmospheric administration in Washington has just announced that 2012 experienced the second largest single-year jump in GHGs ever recorded. Atmospheric levels have reached just under 395 ppm and we are closing in fast on the danger zone of the two degree average annual temperature increase – decades ahead of earlier estimates.
The crowning climax to 2012 – and the crowning irony – was the UN Climate Conference in Doha, the capital of Qatar which happens to be the world’s biggest polluter in per capita GHG emissions. Once again there was no agreement on collective action to control emissions; the only winner was the fossil fuel industry. Certainly it was an appropriate location for the conference considering that Doha is one of the fossil fuel capitals of the world.

Kyoto, now a ghost agreement on life support, survived the conference but only fifteen percent of global emissions are covered by the remaining signatories. If North American concern for climate change is measured by our commitment to Kyoto, the only international agreement on GHG emissions, we are in deep trouble. Because Canada and the US are both major league petro-states now, the lack of commitment is understandable but nevertheless reprehensible.

Canada has been actively undermining Kyoto for the last few years and finally walked out last year. The US has never ratified Kyoto and it has been actively sabotaging the negotiations in recent years, including Doha according to international activists. Yet, President Obama in his victory speech in November, just weeks before the Doha conference, declared: “We want our children to live in an America . . . that isn’t threatened by the destructive power of a warming planet.” You cannot isolate America from a warming planet, Mr. President. Geography 101.

If our governments are opposing climate change initiatives on the international stage to play to the home crowd for votes, then we have to challenge them, otherwise we are complicit in the charade. If our countries are not committed to a global climate agreement because of narrow national interests, how serious is our commitment to the future of the planet? We do need inspiring and uplifting speeches but we also need honesty. Empty words merely create cynicism.

Securing the future” is not a catchy election phrase or another ephemeral political issue – it is a moral matter. As voters, it is our ethical responsibility to persuade our politicians of their obligation both to the global community and to future generations. To reinforce this message, we need only remember the Kenyan proverb: We have not inherited this land from our ancestors; rather we have borrowed it from our children.

To initiate change, we first have to transform our own individual hearts as Gandhi reminded us. We have to build personal lifestyles that are sustainable before we demand changes of our governments. How we cast our votes is also a reflection of the state of our hearts. We must use the privilege of our vote, not for short term self-interest or ideological reasons, but for the benefit of those without a voice. Let us not forget that we hold the proxy votes of unborn citizens.

Lest our lawmakers ignore our votes, they should be mindful of the age-old counsel of the Iroquois nation that we should consider the well-being of our progeny seven generations into the future when making decisions:

Look and listen for the welfare of the whole people and have always in view not only the present but also the coming generations, even those whose faces are yet beneath the surface of the ground – the unborn of the future Nation.  Great Law of the Iroquois.

Friday, 22 February 2013

Losing Iowa's land -- by Jim Kessler

Jim Kessler grew up in a Quaker family on a dairy farm near Oskaloosa, Iowa. He became interested in environmental issues during graduate school at the University of Northern Iowa while working on his MA in Biology. Kessler has been involved in tallgrass prairie and native plant restoration for 35 years, the last 15 on his and his wife’s 30 acres near Grinnell, Iowa. He says, "I view myself as a simple Quaker man who intensely loves Jesus and tries to live a servant life in that awareness daily."



Before: 
tall grass prairie (photos by J Kessler)






  
After:  
a steep hillside pasture that was plowed last fall; clay shows where topsoil eroded
The agrofuel threat to biodiversity isn't just happening in the underdeveloped world. (1) It's a huge threat to biodiversity and topsoil in the US Midwest and I suspect parts of Canada. (2)  Worldwide, marginal lands (grasslands) are rapidly being plowed. (3)  

erosion: Iowa State U
runoff and dead zone: Buckner
In my part of Iowa I've observed many permanent pastures being ripped up to raise corn and soybeans. Much of this land is highly erodible. (4) Though our topsoil in some places is 100 feet deep, the richest land in the world, Iowa loses an average of 5.2 tons per acre per year. (5)

erosion: Iowa Environmental Council
This is a huge threat to biodiversity. Corn and soybean fields provide lots of food for wild turkeys, raccoons, and deer, but almost no food for most other native wildlife species. 

Biologists who study the amount of habitat needed by species predict that for every 1% of habitat that is converted to raising crops, we will eventually lose 1% of our wildlife species to extinction. Also, grasslands sequester carbon. Well managed grazed grasslands reduce soil erosion and contribute very little to the dead zones in our oceans. I'm beginning to understand that agrofuels are a losing proposition for us and the planet. My sense of urgency led me to give talks and workshops about re-establishing Native Plants in order to
  • respond locally to the 6th great extinction crisis
  • reverse the decline in native migratory songbirds
  • stop destruction of wildlife habitat and biodiversity
  • maintain pollinator populations to increase food security. 
And I am trying to set up a nonprofit to reestablish native plants in my region, Empowering Nature and People: all workshop fees and consulting charges will be donated to organizations like Right Sharing of World Resources that help the poor. 
 
Corn and soybean profits will eventually crash because of oversupply. I hope then farmers will turn cropland back into native grasslands through the Conservation Reserve Program unless the radical right succeed in their campaign to defund it. 




Notes 
1. Agrofuel land grabs in Africa: UK Guardian 31 May 2011
Growing jatropha for agrofuel, Ivory Coast: 
courtesy UK Guardian and Kambou Sia/AFP/Getty Images
2. Washing Away the Fields of Iowa, NYT 4 May 2011; statistics and Iowa erosion map, Iowa Environmental CouncilCorn And Soybeans Are Conquering U.S. Grasslands, NPR 19 Feb 2013; King Corn Mowed Down 2 Million Acres of Grassland in 5 Years Flat, Mother Jones 20 Feb 2013.
3. The LULUCF program threatens to promote further land grabs, agrofuel and GMO plantations worldwide, in return for carbon credits. This will give pollution permits to fossil-fuel industries, load poor countries with debt, and do nothing to save biodiversity or halt climate chaos: a lose-lose-lose proposition. 
4. Monica Buckner, Montana State U, The Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone.
5. photo and statistic: Iowa State University.

Further reading
Wikipedia on Tallgrass prairie
Tallgrass Prairie Center, University of Northern Iowa 
Sean Garrity's short-grass buffalo prairie in MT 
Frank and Deborah Popper's proposal for a shortgrass Buffalo Commons in 10 High Plains states

Thursday, 27 December 2012

Restructuring society -- by Alan N. Connor

Why we need a circular economy 

Al Connor speaking to QEW
If nothing else persuades us that we need a new model for the global economy, the present recession should. A number of people reached that conclusion a few years before the “meltdown” in 2008. John Cobb and Herman Daly [1] advocated for it before the turn of the century. David Korten has called for a new economic paradigm in an Agenda for a New Economy.[2]

It is obvious to many of us, who are studying and concerned about the present economy that the present system of the industrially developed world is not sustainable. It is based on perpetual economic growth and perpetual supply of natural resources that the Earth does not have. Those resources--fossil fuels, minerals, pure water, fertile top soil, timber -- are being used, extracted, converted to goods much faster than nature can reproduce them. And they are discarded at a rate that is faster than nature can absorb them.

Such a system requires ever increasing consumption to maintain ever increasing production by industries simply to continue to maximize profits that are shared by the wealthy investors who own most of the shares of stocks. Rather than meet need, it produces goods and services that are not necessary for a good quality of life. It creates demand for non-necessities via advertising that values individual and household opulence rather than the “good life”. It is a system that prices a significant portion of the population out of the market for necessities by limiting supply to keep the effective demand price high.

Aggregation of luxurious goods and assets designates the winners in our competitive economic game. The wealth gap between winners (investment bankers and corporate executives) and losers (workers) increases inequitably. Costs of essential goods and services, such as healthcare, shelter, transportation, education food, fuel, utilities, are inflated above their intrinsic value. And necessities are priced at levels many low paid workers, doing work that In addition, our present economic-industrial system emits gasses and micro particles into the atmosphere and pollutants into our water and soils that degrade them and are hazardous to the public's health. There is empirical evidence and consensus among atmospheric and eco-biological scientists that industrial and agricultural emissions and pollutants are changing the Earth’s climate and its ability to sustain existing life.[3] According to a number of economists a limited or even a no-growth economy in which a majority of people prosper is possible.

Economists and atmospheric and biological scientists have claimed that such an economy is necessary for human and most other life forms that inhabit earth today to continue to exist. James Hansen, chief atmospheric scientist for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), has said and written that CO2 in Earth’s atmosphere must be limited to 350 parts per million (ppm) to avert a future catastrophe. Some regions now have over 400 ppm.
Given the above information, plus the extreme weather and catastrophic events the Earth and its inhabitants have experienced this decade, an economy that is not driven by depleting fossil fuels and other minerals is worth trying. Hansen and a few other Earth and atmospheric scientists, recently, have said that much of the Earth’s altered eco-systems cannot be restored to their original condition and function. Since we cannot restore them to their original condition, human and other life will have to adapt to the extant ecology and perhaps regenerate the damaged and degraded eco-regions.

Probably many of us have a vision of how a new economy might be structured. A few have written books and scholarly papers describing their vision or some of the elements of what they believe a viable, sustainable economy include.[5]There are variations among the visions cited, but there are similarities also. Korten and McKibben envision an economy that is local community based, rather than globally based. Jackson, Daly, Brown and Garver envision global governances and cultures that enable nations, regions, municipalities to establish and operate institutions, polities and economies in which all citizens participate and have access to the essentials of the “good life”. All of them see the necessity for an economy that is not reliant on and driven by non-renewable resources such as fossil fuels, present state of the art nuclear power, minerals that are converted, used and discarded at rates faster than they can be renewed. In order for an economy to be sustainable, the ecological environment in which it exists and of which it is a subsystem, must be sustainable.

My vision

Seek the shalom of your community - montage by J. Fowler

My vision of a worldwide social system is one that consists of local communities that are economically, ecologically and socio-culturally sustainable. They are self organized primarily to increase the probability that the settlement will persist into perpetuity.[6] According to Parsons and Smelser the original, primary function of an economy was to harvest and extract local natural resources and convert them into useful goods and services that enable the local settlement to persist into the future. The goal and purpose or mission of the economy is to sustain the community not amass individual wealth. They defined the function of the polity – organized politics – as acquisition and control of resources so the inhabitants of the settlement can perform its economic functions. The local community culture then functions to create and promulgate values and behavioral norms that enable its economy and polity to perform community-sustaining functions.[7] 

Communities are social systems that cannot persist very far into the future in isolation. Closed systems become entropic.[8] For any system to persist, be it social, biological, mechanical or physical, it must put out some utile good into one or more other systems and must input one or more utile good from beyond its boundary -- i.e. from one or more neighboring systems. All systems are interdependent. Primitive settlements knew that.In order for communities to persist into perpetuity, they must be parsimonious in the extraction, harvesting, conversion and output of local natural resources, particularly those resources that require centuries to regenerate or renew themselves.[9] Natural resources, whether renewable or not, are a community‘s natural capital assets. They need to be conserved. Throughput (extraction, harvesting, conversion allocation, distribution and consumption of a resource) needs to be durable, reusable and recyclable. Extraction should be at a rate that is not faster than the rate at which resources can regenerate and reproduce themselves.[10]

Internal Community Systems 

For a community to be sustainable for seven generations or longer, its internal systems must function to sustain its inhabitants. A community is a social-ecological system. It is social because it consists of people who settle in a more or less proscribed environment and relate to and interact with one another. They collectively develop behavioral norms and rules for relating and interacting in ways that do not harm one another and the environment that sustains them. It is ecological in that these particular people have settled in a place that provides them with natural resources that support and sustain lives.
We can consider the community or settlement a system of subsystems: the economy, the polity and the socio-culture.[11]  Daly maintains that the economic system is a subsystem of the eco-region or ecological system.[12]  For purposes of this discussion, let us consider community system and its subsystems: economy, socio-culture and polity as subsystems of the local eco-region in which the community is located. Each of those subsystems can also be thought of as composed of a set of subsystems.

Within a community economy there could be the following subsystems: manufacturing for producing and distributing products that are essential for a decent quality of life as defined by the local socio-culture; food production, allocation and distribution; banking (the allocation and distribution of credit, accounting and managing of local currency) and the exchange of goods and services within the community and with external communities. 

The socio-cultural subsystem includes: families and other household forms, religious, service and civic groups and organizations, educational institutions, friendship groups. Those groups and organizations, formal and informal, develop and model the community’s ethic, values, behavioral and social norms and develop informal means to reinforce compliance and punish noncompliance.

The polity consists of the institutions that make or enact community public policy decisions and enact ordinances that conform to the community’s norms and values, allocate and regulate access to the community’s natural capital assets,[13] and enforce compliance to local public policy. It might include such institutions as police and fire departments, healthcare, social and legal services, conflict resolution organizations, overseeing the commons and infrastructure building, management and maintenance.

A Community Economic System

A community economic system would produce for all the community’s inhabitants such goods as safe, healthy and tasty food; shelter; pure, fresh water for local agricultural, industrial, and household use; tools, energy and technology that enable inhabitants to produce sustaining goods and perform sustaining services. It would include the organizations and institutions that effectively and efficiently allocate and distribute those goods and services to all the community’s inhabitants consistent with their need. Those organizations and institutions form the communities’ polities. Because each inhabitant would function in a social role the community values, a sustainable supply of goods and services would be his/her right. 
 
The goods produced from non-renewable resources or resources that take years to regenerate or reproduce themselves, must be long lasting, reusable and recyclable and could pass through a number of users. That would reduce waste, hopefully, to the capacity at which the local environment can absorb it. Tools and technology used in any specific community would be appropriate for the local ecological environment and for the tasks they are to perform. To the extent possible, the materials to produce them would be found locally. 
 
What is not available locally can be imported. Technology can be designed that is appropriate to the function it is to perform. Some materials needed but not found in the local community and its environs may need to be imported. The communities involved in the transaction would seek to develop an exchange that would be advantageous to each. They would be cooperators not competitors.

The means of production would be locally owned and operated. Community businesses that required substantial investment could be owned by local working and consumer investors. Such operations could be cooperatives or locally owned limited liability partnerships or corporations. That would insure that the business’s product and its profits benefit the community and its inhabitants, primarily. If incorporated, the corporation’s mission must be to provide a good or service that is for the community’s common good. If its product or service ceases to benefit the community and its inhabitants, the corporation should be dissolved. Local family and individual entrepreneurial ownership should be encouraged and supported.

Locally owned and operated banks, venture capital funds and business incubators could help provide startup and operating loans to local businesses based on the Grameen micro loan model.[14] Community individuals, families, banks, institutions, mutual insurers and the local government could purchase shares in such funds and incubators. Banks operating in the community would be owned by community depositors. They could be credit unions, cooperatively owned banks and building and loan associations. Wall Street bankers and brokerage houses and equity investors should be prohibited from purchasing shares in community owned financial institutions. They tend to suck wealth from the community and exacerbate local poverty rather than create and spread prosperity.[15]  No matter how the financial system is structured, its policies should be determined by a board of directors consisting of local residents, blue and white collar workers and small business operators as well as lawyers, accountants and local business administrators and financiers. 
 
Neighboring communities and urban neighborhoods within the same watershed, or a portion of the same large watershed, can organize regional banking and credit systems. Theycould provide backup to local systems and help establish fair exchange rates between different community currencies. For broader exchanges and transactions, a national currency would be used.

Community government can deposit all its revenue in the municipally owned bank, if the municipality elects to charter its own bank, or one or more of the local depositor owned cooperative banks. Then revenue would be available for community sustainability and development purposes. Municipal and cooperatively owned community banks would charge interest only the net profit earned on a loan.[16]

A Community Polity
 
Montreal political demo 2012
Parsons and Smelser define the polity or political subsystem as one that functions to acquire resources.[17]  For our purposes we can reword that to, functions to access and control natural resources. In a community where the local socio-culture has adopted an ethic that considers all natural resources in the community and its environs public property or the commons, those natural resources are controlled by the people of the community through its democratically elected local government. That government allocates access to residents on the basis of benefit to the community’s common good and the applicant’s need.

The polity, via its participatory democratic legislative and administrative subsystems, monitors the public behavior of the community’s residents and visitors while in the community and enforces compliance to those behavioral norms and values that have become rules and ordinances.

It also monitors the public behavior of local businesses, organizations, institutions and employed members of the local government. It judges the outcomes of those interactions and positively sanctions those that benefit the common good of the community and its inhabitants and negatively sanctions interaction and behavior that is not so beneficial. The polity enacts ordinances and rules that regulate how persons occupying certain community roles should interact with members of the community as well as what behaviors and functions are expected of them.

A Socio-cultural Subsystem

A socio-cultural system functions to develop community values and norms by which residents, institutions, businesses and organizations interact with one another, the local and surrounding environment and its natural and human resources. In so doing, the system defines roles that are of value to the community. The performance of those roles that benefit some or all members of the community, the community’s structure and functions, become valued. Some behavioral norms will be legislated by the polity as ordinances or rules.

Some will be implied and unwritten – i.e. the community’s mores. Most will be passed down from elder to younger by word of mouth, written and oral stories and role modeling. That is an expectation of the family, the church, synagogue, mosque, etc. and the school. Some of the roles performed in the community are publicly and legally defined, such as mayor and town council, fireman, policeman, public works director and town clerk. Others are defined in contracts as job descriptions – e.g. school principal, teacher, minister, rabbi, imam. Some are defined by employers by contract and in some cases by oral agreement. In all those cases the expected interactive behaviors and role functions are explicated or understood implicitly. The responsibility and authority of the role occupant are also understood, although implicit expectations are not always clear. For many roles, there may not be a clearly written or explicit definition. The roles of parent, child, neighbor and employer are seldom explicated. Nevertheless, compliance with role expectations is positively reinforced and there are penalties if persons assuming those roles perform them in ways that harm one or more community members.

Local socio-cultures also can establish norms regarding the allocation of access to and control of the natural and human resources of the community and environs. Nowadays, how individuals, local governments, institutions, local and transnational businesses harvest, extract and utilize local resources is determined by state and national legislatures and agencies that often have little knowledge of how their decisions and policies affect communities and the eco-regions in which they exist. Since those resources are the communities’ common property, those are policy decisions which should be determined by the communities in which those resources are located. 

Integrating Community Systems with Regional, National and Global Governance
 

Neighboring municipalities within a prescribed area can cooperate and collaborate with regard to certain functions, thus forming a region. A logical prescribed area is a watershed or sub watershed. Each watershed forms an ecological region (eco-region). It has a unique set of natural resources--i.e. natural capital: water, timber, minerals, soil, wetlands, topography, flora, wildlife. 
 
Each municipal community with its unique polity, economy and culture, determines to whom access to land within its political boundaries is to be allocated and how it is to be used. Some municipal lands will remain common – publicly owned. Access to and use of that land and its resources will be determined and monitored by the local polity. Each municipal community will need to monitor use of privately held land to insure that the holder does not use it in ways that harm neighbors and other members of the community. However, control of access to, allocation and use of land in the region not within any municipality’s boundaries, could be the joint responsibility of the polities of all the municipalities in the region. So a regional polity or governance would need to be formed. Preferably, all governances would be democratic, impartial and operate in the best interests of all persons and institutions within their jurisdictions.

Such regions already exist as counties in the United States. Their boundaries are usually determined by survey lines and surface waterways. Those determined by waterways divide eco-regions. Those divided by surveys into sections and townships often include parts of watersheds and eco-regions. Where watersheds and eco-regions are split among municipalities and counties, some form of joint governance seems logical. In making public policy regarding allocation and access to and uses of eco-region resources, knowledge and consideration of regional social culture is a requisite.

Within a region, even a small municipality such as village or rural township, there is likely to be conflicting social cultures. Different socio-economic, ethnic, religious and age groups may value community and eco-region resources differently. Those value conflicts need to be negotiated so that regional resource policy for the common good is established. There are three ways to resolve such conflict without third party intervention: conquest, compromise and consensus.[18] In conquest, one side wins and all others lose. In compromise all give up something, thus all sides lose some, but less than they might in a contest. In consensus or synthesis a new solution is developed and all sides win, at least no one loses.

Other functions that would benefit by inter-community regional planning and policy-making, ordinance monitoring and enforcement -- are public transportation, power generation and distribution, banking and trade.

Municipal and Regional Healthcare Systems 
Primary and much secondary healthcare, for the most part, are local community concerns. That is especially true for disease and injury prevention. Geology, geography, topography and climate vary from community to community. Thus the prevalence of disease and injury varies from community to community. Local health service providers and consumers are most knowledgeable about the diseases and injuries that are most prevalent in their communities. They also tend to be most knowledgeable about treatments that are most effective in their communities.

So the mission and functions of a community based and controlled healthcare system would be to assure that the highest quality care is accessible to all residents of and visitors to the community as promptly as possible. 
 
The system also is to assure that the most effective treatments are available when needed. To assure that all members of and visitors to the community have access to top quality care from the local system when needed, the system probably would need a significant amount of local public funding. A source of funds for such a system could be local taxes on real property or other taxes that fund other necessary local services such as police, firefighters, infrastructure construction and maintenance, waste pickup and disposal, snow removal and other forms of emergency assistance that may be needed from time to time. If such a service were administered and delivered by the community’s regional health department or a community agency established specifically to deliver healthcare services, a progressive premium payment system could be designed to operate a prepaid healthcare delivery service. Or a community might opt for a combination of local tax and premium payment funding. 
 
Policy regarding where and by whom treatment and support services should be delivered should be made by a democratic body of local service providers and knowledgeable local consumers. Policy regarding funding such a local community system and costs of treatment and support and ancillary services also would be determined and monitored by such a body. A local body authorized to oversee ethical practices of local providers will need to be established. Such a body could also determine how local health service providers would be paid and how much they would be paid.

Not every municipality has a population large enough to support a secondary or tertiary care medical facility with state-of-the-art diagnostic and treatment technology. A group of neighboring communities with well administered primary care facilities could form a network to jointly fund, develop policy for and oversee a secondary and tertiary regional health care service. An entity consisting of representatives of local community health care delivery agencies and knowledgeable consumer advocates could oversee and administer such a system. 

Municipal, Regional and Interregional Public Transit
Efficient, convenient, inter-municipality, region wide public transit can have a lot of payoffs for all the people in the region and its communities. It reduces commuting use which:
  • Reduces commuting costs to households
  • Reduces the need for acres and acres of impervious parking lots and expensive multi-story and underground parking structures thus reducing polluting storm water runoff.
  • Makes more space available for residential and commercial use of in-town land thus supporting non-motor and pedestrian scale development.
  • Reduces the amount of impervious roadway needed which further reduces polluting storm water runoff and the cost of street, road and highway construction and maintenance.
  • Reduces the amount of greenhouse gasses emitted to the atmosphere, which improves the quality of local air and the threat to local and regional public health and the rate of global climate change.
  • Reduces costs to municipalities and regions that are external to transportation operations.
Transportation systems, including public right-of-way for private vehicles, are not self-supporting. They require taxpayer support. Public transit requires less subsidy than streets, roads, highways and bridges for millions of private vehicles. As use of public transit increases and private vehicle use decreases, costs for infrastructure and maintenance are reduced.
External costs are also reduced. Inter-region and inter-urban public transit systems can have the same positive consequences as region-wide public transit systems. They need an inter-regional governing and planning institution with authority to match their responsibility that understands the socio-cultural and ecological values and ethos of the regions involved so they can make transportation policy with those values and ethos.

Municipal and Regional Power Generation and Transmission 
 
To the extent space permits, each community or neighborhood within a city can have its own electric generating and transmission system. On-site generation combined with net metering, should be encouraged, particularly for public facilities. Solar, wind and low-head hydro-electric generation and combinations thereof could be used where practicable. Using local renewable energy to produce energy for local industrial, commercial, municipal and household use increases energy efficiency, reduces cost and the local carbon footprint. It also reduces external costs such as mitigation of environmental degradation an healthcare costs. 
 
Non-profit municipal and cooperatively owned systems can reduce the cost of power to consumers and increase generation and transmission efficiency. Efficiency is increased because transmission distances from local generation plants to local consumers are less than distances from monopolistic. Corporation owned centrally controlled power generation plants that transmit electricity over long distances that much of the electricity is lost as stray voltage. Costs to consumers are reduced because of increased efficiency and small local systems’ mission is to provide a local service rather than maximize profits and enable executives and principal shareholders to amass wealth. 
 
Eco-economy
 
My vision of a restructured economy is one in which local community citizens cooperatively make decisions that effect their community’s environment, its unincorporated environs and the social lives of its residents. Community is defined as a self-organizing settlement consisting of families and individuals living in households that interact with one another for the purpose of sustaining that settlement and its inhabitants into perpetuity. 
 
Members of the community—i.e. citizens--perceive their community as a subsystem within a natural, ecological system that contains the natural assets/resources that provide the necessities that support lives. And the community in turn organizes a number of interactive subsystems that need to function collaboratively to increase the probability that the community and its inhabitants are sustained into perpetuity. 
 
The three major community systems are the socio-culture, the economy and the polity. The socio-cultural system develops values and interactive norms that, when adhered to, enable community residents to occupy and perform community and eco-system sustaining roles. The economic system produces and manufactures goods from locally grown and extracted natural assets that help sustain the community. It also imports needed resources that are not available locally from other communities in exchange for local resources and goods other communities may need to sustain themselves. The economy develops means for local investment, establishing credit and intra-community exchange. The polity’s functions include: controlling access to the community’s common natural assets, organizing entities consisting of local citizens that monitor access to and use of such assets, in compliance with interactive social-cultural norms.

Examples of functions of community services, considered here as subsystems of the above three are discussed briefly. We also try to show how each of those subsystems needs to develop networks with systems of neighbor communities for local community subsystems to function with optimum effectiveness, efficiency — i.e. sustainability.

We argue that local community systems designed by community residents, owned in common can operate to sustain communities and their environs into the distant future. In such communities valued social roles can develop for each resident. Those roles enable them to contribute to the welfare and sustainability of their communities.

Notes
  1. See Herman E. Daly, Beyond Growth (1996), Toward a Steady State Economy (1973) and Daly and Cobb, For the Common Good (1989.)
  2. David Korten, Agenda for a New Economy: From Phantom Wealth to Real Wealth 2nd ed. (2010)
  3. IPCC report (2007), Paul and Anne Ehrlich, The Dominant Animal: Human Evolution and the Environment (2008)
  4. Daly, Beyond Growth (1996) and For the Common Good (1989), Tim Jackson, Prosperity Without Growth: The Transition to a Sustainable Economy (2009), Korten, Agenda for a New Economy (2010), Bill McKibben , Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future (2007), Robertson, Transforming Economic Life: A Millenial Change (1999).
  5. Tim Jackson, Prosperity Without Growth (2009); Peter Brown and Geoff Garver, Right Relationship (2009),;J. W. Smith “Full & Equal Rights: providing all a quality of life while reducing labor and resource use by Half.” Institute for Economic Democracy. Mar. 22, 2009; David Korten, Agenda for a New Economy (2010), Lester Brown, Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization (2008); Bill McKibben, Deep Economy (2007), Daly, Toward a Steady State Economy (1973).
  6. Talcott Parsons and Neil J. Smelser, Economy and Society: A Study of the Integration of Economic and Social Theory (1956).
  7. Ibid.
  8. Ludwig Von Bertalanfy. General Systems Theory: Foundations, Development and Applications (1968)
  9. Herman Daly “The Illth of Nations and the Fecklessness of Policy: An Ecological Economist's Perspective.” Nov. 2003 Post-autistic Economics Review. No. 22 (pp1-4) and Beyond Growth (1996), Lester Brown, Plan B 3.0 (2008), McKibben, Deep Economy (2007)
  10. Daly, ibid.
  11. Parsons and Smelser, Economy and Society (1956).
  12. Daly, Beyond Growth (1996).
  13. Parsons & Smelser, Economy and Society (1956).
  14. Michael Foley, “Microcredit: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” Yes magazine. Jan. 23, 2011.
  15. Ibid.
  16. Ellen Brown, What a Public Bank Could Mean for California,” Yes Magazine May 16, 2004.
  17. Parsons and Smelser, Economy and Society (1956).
  18. Arthur Dunham, The New Community Organization (1970) pp. 241-243.